Are Invasive Plants Really
A Problem In Missouri???
Tim Banek, MDC
Let’s start with the definition of an invasive species. The National Invasive Species Council
defines an invasive species as: “A species that is non-native to the
ecosystem under consideration and whose introduction causes or is likely to
cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.” Does
that mean all non-native plants are bad?
Certainly not, in fact a very small percentage (2-3%) of the over 800 plants
introduced into Missouri are considered invasive. Many non-native plants are not invasive and
support human livelihoods or a preferred quality of life. Nearly all of the crops that are used for
agriculture in the United States were introduced from other countries. Although the percentage of non-native plants
that are invasive is relatively low, the detrimental effects and costs related
to the damage invasive plants cause are very high. The most widely referenced paper (Pimental et
al. 2005) on this issue reports that invasive species cost the United States
more than $120 billion in damages every year.
To complicate matters more, invasive plants cause both direct and
indirect effects that are often difficult to equate to a dollar value.
Bush honeysuckle infestation in Missouri. Photo by Larry Rizzo |
Invasive plants are aggressive, prolific, outcompete and
displace native plants that provide the necessary food and habitat for native
animals. Invasive plants arrive in
Missouri in one of two ways: intentionally
or accidentally. The global economy of
today’s world means that species from all over the world can unintentionally be
transported to the United States and to Missouri as hitchhikers on or in
imported cargo shipments. However, some
of the worst plant invaders such as, bush honeysuckle and autumn olive have
been introduced intentionally for landscaping, herbal uses, wildlife benefits,
erosion control, or wastewater treatment.
The aggressive, competitive characteristics of invasive plants are such
that they threaten the stability of ecosystems by reducing biological diversity
and replacing beneficial native species with non-native plants that don’t
provide the same ecosystem functions necessary to support native animal species
and sustain life. One common belief is that
the United States is blessed with ample public lands to support nature and
provide the ecosystem functions necessary to maintain our native species. While Missouri is fortunate to have a great
deal of public land, 93% of Missouri’s landscape is privately owned. Habitat destruction and invasive species are
the two largest threats to biodiversity and native plant communities in the
United States. Habitat destruction is
occurring at the rate of 6,000 acres per day or 2.2 million acres annually resulting
in habitat fragmentation that is continually reducing the amount of habitat
available to support wildlife populations.
So what can Missourians do to reduce or reverse the effects of
invasive species? Landowners could
reevaluate the choices that they make for landscaping. It will certainly be a cultural change, but
landowners should consider factors other than solely the appearance of plants
used for landscaping. It seems that most
homeowners would like to enjoy birds, butterflies and other wildlife to enhance
their landscapes and the enjoyment of their private spaces. Homeowners can choose to use plants that
support wildlife and provide habitat that will help to connect parks and public
lands. Ecosystem functions such as, food-web
value, watershed value, soil restorative properties, carbon sequestration and
weather moderation are some of the functions that could be considered. For example, Missouri’s state bird, the
bluebird, relies on insects to provide food to exist. Approximately 4,800 insects are needed to
raise a clutch of bluebirds. Missouri’s
native oaks and maples support between 400 and 500 insect species that provide
food for many insect-eating birds, while the invasive golden rain tree supports
only one known native insect species. Many beautiful butterflies and moths require
specific native host plants. Exotic
invasive species commonly used for landscaping such as, Bradford pears, bush
honeysuckle, Japanese barberry, burning bush, winter creeper, privet, tree-of-heaven,
amur maple, golden rain tree, etc., are not only detrimental when they escape and
invade our native plant communities, they don’t support
the ecosystem functions that native plants provide.
It would be great if only native plants were used in the
landscape trade, but it would be a huge step to plant mainly native species,
reduce grass areas and restrict non-native plants to plants that are not
invasive that are used in only limited areas of the landscape. A book
titled Bringing Nature Home by Dr.
Douglas Tallamy is an excellent resource to provide information on reasons to
use native plants and plant species to select that benefit native wildlife. Another resource is the Grow Native! program administered
by Missouri Prairie Foundation that can be found at the following website: www.moprairie.org/
The Midwest Invasive Plant Network updated
their Landscape Alternatives for Invasive Plants of the Midwest brochure and
developed a free I-phone and I-pad app based on the brochure that can be found
by searching for Landscape Alternatives in the Apple App Store or at www.apps.bugwood.org/apps.html
.
Timothy J. Banek
Invasive Species Coordinator
Missouri Department of
Conservation
PO Box 180
Jefferson City, MO 65102
(573) 522-4115 ext. 3371
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.